CHAPTER 5
Characteristics of Selected Reserve Accessions

Chapter 5

This chapter:












Other chapters:

 

FY 1999 Reserve Component recruiting results for NPS and prior service gains and assigned end-strengths are shown in Table 5.1.  In FY 1999, the Reserve Component recruited 143,855 enlisted persons compared to the Active Component's almost 184,000. The ARNG has the largest Reserve Component recruiting program, followed by the Army Reserve (USAR).  The ARNG recruited nearly 29,000 NPs enlistees, approximately 15,000 more than the USAR.  However, the USAR recruited just over 30,000 prior service recruits, nearly 2,000 more than the ARNG.  Recognizing the importance of experience provided by qualified prior service personnel to the Reserve Forces, Congress established additional prior service accessions for the ARNG as part of the Army Guard Combat Reform Initiative:  "The Secretary of the Army, shall increase the number of qualified prior active-duty enlisted members in the Army National Guard." [1]   While the legislation applies only to the ARNG, the Secretary of the Army has required the Army Reserve to comply, which would explain the large number of prior service accessions to the USAR and the ARNG.

Selected Reserve recruiting achievements decreased by approximately 2,000 enlisted accessions from FY 1998 to FY 1999 (from almost 146,000 to nearly 144,000).  The Army National Guard and the Naval Reserve increased while all other components experienced cuts.    

Due to differences in mission and force structure, the size of recruit cohorts by component varied greatly.  Therefore, comparisons between the Reserve Component percentages must be interpreted with care.  The Army Components—the ARNG and USAR—had the largest Selected Reserve recruit cohorts, recruiting 70 percent of total Reserve Component accessions (40 and 30 percent for the ARNG and USAR, respectively) in FY 1999.  The Naval Reserve (USNR) and Air Force Reserve (USAFR) had the highest proportion of prior service recruits (85 percent and 82 percent of their total recruiting efforts, respectively).  The Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) had the lowest proportion of recruits with past military experience (39 percent).  Prior service accessions provide the Reserve Component with a more experienced personnel base, contributing to increased readiness to meet future missions.

Table 5.1.  FY 1999 Selected Reserve Non-Prior Service (NPs) and Prior Service Enlisted Accessions and End-Strengths

 

Enlisted Accessions

 

 

 Component

Non-Prior Service

  Prior Service

 

  Total

Prior Service Percent of Component Total

  Enlisted End-Strength

Army National Guard

28,663

28,447

57,110

49.8

319,161

Army Reserve

13,484

30,125

43,609

69.1

161,930

Naval Reserve

2,641

15,251

17,892

85.2

69,999

USMC Reserve

5,778

3,758

9,536

39.4

35,947

Air National Guard

3,467

4,930

8,397

58.7

92,424

Air Force Reserve

1,335

5,976

7,311

81.7

55,557

DoD Total

55,368

88,487

143,855

61.5

735,018

Also see Appendix Tables C-1 (NPs Age by Component and Gender),  C-9 (Prior Service Age by Component and Gender), and C-15 (Enlisted Member Age by Component and Gender).

 

The increase in availability of prior service recruits, a temporary phenomenon due to the larger number of active duty members leaving service during the drawdown, has ended.  The result is fewer prior service individuals from which the Reserve Component can recruit.  In fact, the more successful the Military Services are in retaining active duty members, the smaller the prior services pool becomes.  Thus, the Reserve Component must recruit NPs individuals, in direct competition with the Active Component. The numerical effects of the drawdown, changes in the Reserve mission with increased combat risks due to an increased operating tempo (OpTempo), as well as quality of life and compensation issues have made Reserve recruiting difficult as we enter the 21st century.  Potential recruits are likely to find combat risk, family hardships, and financial losses during a mobilization more important in the Reserve participation decision today and in the future." [2]


[1]   Army National Guard Combat Readiness Reform Act of 1992, Section 1111, Public Law 102-484.

[2]   Asch, B.J., Reserve Supply in the Post-Desert Storm Recruiting Environment (Santa Monica, CA:  RAND Corporation, 1993), p. 5.


back next